COMPARISON OF 2 MODES OF STRESS MEASUREMENT DAILY HASSLES AND UPLIFTS VS. MAJOR LIFE EVENTS
COMPARISON OF 2 MODES OF STRESS MEASUREMENT DAILY HASSLES AND UPLIFTS VS. MAJOR LIFE EVENTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/bf00844845
复制
发表时间：
1981-01-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
LAZARUS R S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
KANNER A D;COYNE J C;LAZARUS R S
将预测心理症状的标准生活事件方法与关注相对较小事件（即日常生活中的麻烦和振奋）的方法进行了比较。构建麻烦和提升量表，并连续 10 个月每月对中年成年人社区样本进行一次测试。与生活事件评分相比，麻烦量表能够更好地预测并发和随后的心理症状，并且该量表共享生活事件造成的症状的大部分差异。当生活事件评分的影响被消除时，麻烦和症状仍然显着相关。女性的提升与症状呈正相关，但男性则不然。麻烦和振奋也与积极和消极的影响相关，尽管程度不大，因此与情绪测量相比，为麻烦和振奋提供了区分验证。与通常的生活事件方法相比，对日常麻烦和振奋的评估可能是预测适应结果的更好方法。
The standard life events methodology for the prediction of psychological symptoms was compared with one focusing on relatively minor events, namely, the hassles and uplifts of everyday life. Hassles and Uplifts Scales were constructed and administered once a month for 10 consecutive months to a community sample of middle-aged human adults. The Hassles Scale was a better predictor of concurrent and subsequent psychological symptoms than were the life events scores, and that the scale shared most of the variance in symptoms accounted for by life events. When the effects of life events scores were removed, hassles and symptoms remained significantly correlated. Uplifts were positively related to symptoms for women but not for men. Hassles and uplifts were also related, although only modestly so, to positive and negative effect, thus providing discriminate validation for hassles and uplifts in comparison to measures of emotion. The assessment of daily hassles and uplifts may be a better approach to the prediction of adaptational outcomes than the usual life events approach.