The Child Stress Disorders Checklist-Short Form: a four-item scale of traumatic stress symptoms in children
The Child Stress Disorders Checklist-Short Form: a four-item scale of traumatic stress symptoms in children
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.01.009
复制
发表时间：
2010-05-01
影响因子：
7
通讯作者：
Saxe, Glenn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Enlow, Michelle Bosquet;Kassam-Adams, Nancy;Saxe, Glenn
目的：开发一种用户友好的量表来测量受伤儿童的创伤应激反应。尽管受伤的青少年发生创伤性应激反应和负面后遗症的风险很高，但可用于评估风险的选择有限，特别是在急性环境中。方法：参与者是因烧伤或急性损伤住院的儿童和青少年（6-18 岁）（N = 147）。在住院期间，家长和护士完成了儿童应激障碍检查表 (CSDC)，这是一项包含 36 项观察员报告的创伤应激症状测量方法。其他既定的儿童创伤应激指标由家长和儿童在住院期间和受伤后 3 个月完成。 CSDC 的简要版本是使用标准心理测量量表开发技术创建的。将所得量表的心理测量特性与原始 CSDC 的心理测量特性进行比较。结果：出现了一个四项目量表（CSDC-Short Form，CSDC-SF），它证明了内部、参与者之间和重测的可靠性以及与完整量表相当的并发、判别和预测有效性。结论：CSDC-SF 评估了受伤儿童的创伤应激反应。由于该措施非常短，并且不需要管理或解释方面的专门培训，因此对于治疗受伤青少年的提供者来说，它可能是一个有用的工具，可以识别那些有创伤性应激反应风险的人。 (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. 保留所有权利。
Objective: To develop a user-friendly scale that measures traumatic stress responses in injured children. Though injured youth are at high risk for traumatic stress reactions and negative sequelae, there are limited options available for assessing risk, particularly in acute settings.Method: Participants were children and adolescents (ages 6-18) hospitalized with burns or acute injuries (N=147). During hospitalization, parents and nurses completed the Child Stress Disorders Checklist (CSDC), a 36-item observer-report measure of traumatic stress symptoms. Other established measures of child traumatic stress were completed by parents and children during hospitalization and 3 months postinjury. A brief version of the CSDC was created using standard psychometric scale development techniques. The psychometric properties of the resultant scale were compared to those of the original CSDC.Results: A four-item scale (CSDC-Short Form, CSDC-SF) emerged that demonstrated internal, interrater, and test-retest reliability and concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity comparable to that of the full scale.Conclusions: The CSDC-SF assesses traumatic stress reactions in injured children. Because the measure is very short and does not require specialized training for administration or interpretation, it may be a useful tool for providers who treat injured youth to identify those at risk for traumatic stress reactions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.