ITEM RELIABILITY FOR THE GRIFFITHS SCALES OF MENTAL-DEVELOPMENT
ITEM RELIABILITY FOR THE GRIFFITHS SCALES OF MENTAL-DEVELOPMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1365-2214.1982.tb00278.x
复制
发表时间：
1982-01-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
HANSON, R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HANSON, R
作为修订Griffiths量表的初步工作，使用给2个月至7岁儿童的测试录像带和大型评分面板，研究了组成原始测试的498个项目在观察者之间对评分的一致性。项目(57项)经常没有得到足够的管理或评分。在3次给药中有1次不可靠，在2次或3次给药中只有23次不可靠。在得分足够高的项目中，88%的管理人员是可靠的。子量表的差异并不像预期的那样，因为运动、个人-社会以及听力和言语量表的表现并不比手眼协调差。观察员之间的协议因儿童的年龄而异。根据最受关注的年龄范围检查了分量表的弱点。
As a preliminary to the revision of the Griffiths scales, the 498 items constituting the original test were studied in terms of interobserver agreement over the scoring, using videotapes of tests, given to children aged from 2 mo.-7 yr, and large scoring panels. Items (57) failed to be administered or scored adequately often. Items (112) were unreliable on 1 in 3 administrations and only 23 were unreliable on 2 or 3 administrations. Among items scored sufficiently often, 88% of all administrations were reliable. Subscale differences were not as expected since the locomotor, personal-social and hearing and speech scales fared no worse than hand-eye coordination. Interobserver agreement varied with the age of the children. Subscale weaknesses were examined in terms of the most concerned age ranges.