A normative study of the revised hasegawa dementia scale: Comparison of demographic influences between the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale and the Mini-Mental Status Examination
A normative study of the revised hasegawa dementia scale: Comparison of demographic influences between the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale and the Mini-Mental Status Examination
复制标题
DOI：
10.1159/000107592
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Woo, J. I.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jeong, J. W.;Kim, K. W.;Woo, J. I.
背景/目标：我们调查了人口统计学对修订的长谷川痴呆量表（HDS-R）表现的影响，并提供了老年人HDS-R的规范数据。方法：对803名55岁或以上的社区居住认知正常老年人进行了HDS-R测试。使用CERAD-K评估包和小型国际神经精神访谈严格排除认知障碍和精神障碍。采用多元线性回归分析研究了人口统计学因素对HDS-R的影响，并采用Chow检验和t统计将其与简易精神状态检查（MMSE）的影响进行了比较。重叠层被用于开发的年龄，教育和性别特异性的规范数据的HDS-R。结果：年龄，教育和性别的影响显着的性能的HDS-R，并解释了22.5%的总分方差。年龄较大、受教育程度较低和男性与HDS-R的表现较低相关。但人口统计学因素对HDS-R的影响远小于对MMSE的影响（t=5.578，d. f. = 800，p < 0.001）。按年龄（60-69，70-79，>= 80），教育程度（0-6，7-12，>= 13）和性别分层的HDS-R的规范性数据被presented.Conclusions：HDS-R比MMSE对人口统计学影响更稳健，规范性数据可能有助于进一步提高其对痴呆的诊断准确性。版权所有（c）2007 S. Karger AG，巴塞尔。
Background/Aims: We investigated the demographic influence on the performance of the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) and provided normative data of the HDS-R in the elderly.Methods: The HDS-R was administered to 803 community-dwelling cognitively normal elderly subjects aged 55 years or over. Cognitive disorders and psychiatric disorders were strictly excluded using the CERAD-K assessment packet and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. The demographic influence on the performance of the HDS-R was examined using multiple linear regression analyses, and compared with that on the performance of the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) using the Chow test and t statistics. Overlapping strata were used in developing age-, education- and gender-specific normative data of the HDS-R.Results: Age, education, and gender influenced significantly the performance of the HDS-R, and explained 22.5% of the total score variance. Older age, lower education, and male gender were associated with lower performance of the HDS-R. However, the demographic influence on the HDS-R was much weaker than that on the MMSE (t=5.578, d.f. = 800, p < 0.001). The normative data of the HDS-R stratified by age (60-69, 70-79, >= 80), education (0-6, 7-12, >= 13), and gender were presented.Conclusions: The HDS-R was more robust to demographic influences than the MMSE, and normative data may contribute to improving further its diagnostic accuracy for dementia. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.