The BRICS and international peacebuilding and statebuilding
The BRICS and international peacebuilding and statebuilding
复制标题
金砖国家与国际和平建设和国家建设
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ioannis Tellidis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver P. Richmond;Ioannis Tellidis
金砖国家的出现引发了关于建设和平和捐助者活动的新一轮辩论。这慢慢地影响到国际建设和平、国家建设和发展的目标、规范和做法。金砖国家成员在利益、方法和动机、权力、影响力以及对既定标准(如OECD-DAC原则)的遵守或拒绝方面存在细微差异。这些州的活动经常招致传统捐赠者的怀疑和批评。对它们参与发展、建设和平、国家建设及其相关机构和做法的干预形式的审查表明，金砖国家既可以是“现状”行为者，也可以是“关键”行为者。一方面，他们都奉行自由的和平模式及其往往是新自由主义的议程，允许他们保护主权和不干预，追求贸易利益，并促进自己的利益(比如在联合国安理会占有一席之地，保持地区稳定，或者保持他们经常模棱两可的既是援助国又是接受者的地位)。另一方面，它们的参与通过它们自己的捐助者和和平议程的展开，挑战了建设和平和发展的欧洲-大西洋性质。本报告重点介绍了传统行为者和新兴行为者议程趋同和背离的情况，以及这些议程背后的动机。
The emergence of the BRICS has generated a renewed debate about peacebuilding and donor activity. This has slowly influenced the aims, norms and practices of international peacebuilding, statebuilding and development. There are subtle differences in BRICS members’ interests, approaches and motives, power, influence, and adherence to or rejection of established standards (such as OECD-DAC principles). These states’ activities have often attracted scepticism and criticism from traditional donors. An examination of their engagement with interventionary forms of development, peacebuilding, statebuilding, and their related institutions and practices shows that the BRICS can be both “status-quo” and “critical” actors. On the one hand, they all engage with the liberal peace paradigm and its often-neoliberal agenda that allows them to protect sovereignty and non-intervention, pursue trade interests, and advance their own interests (like a seat on the UN Security Council, regional stability or maintaining their often-ambiguous status of being both aid donors and recipients). On the other hand, their involvement has challenged peacebuilding’s and development’s Euro-Atlantic character through the unfolding of their own donor and peace agendas. This report highlights the instances in which traditional and emerging actors’ agendas converge and diverge – and the motivations behind these agendas.