The Rural Imaginary: Landscape, Village, Tradition
The Rural Imaginary: Landscape, Village, Tradition
复制标题
乡村想象:风景、村庄、传统
DOI:
10.1002/9780470996966.ch13
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Scott R. Schnell
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scott R. Schnell
Agrarian images seem out of place in the highly urbanized and cosmopolitan society Japan has become. When the subject of Japan is broached these days, one is far more likely to think of bullet trains and robotics, the fashion industry, anime, and popular music idols than rustic villagers in sedge hats bent over a flooded rice paddy. In fact, the rural population in Japan has been steadily decreasing for several decades, and the challenge of how to stem the flow of young people to the cities or to lure new residents to take their places is heavy on the minds of local administrators. If rural areas are in such decline, why should they warrant more than a cursory glance by students of contemporary Japan? One could argue that the Japanese government’s decentralization policies hinge on the revitalization of rural communities; that frustration with traffic congestion and cramped living conditions has led thousands of urban residents back to the countryside in search of a more satisfying lifestyle (the so-called ‘‘u-turn phenomenon’’); that increasing concerns about air, food, and water quality and their effect on human health have led to a recognition of urban–rural linkages as the key to a more sustainable future (Knight 1994; Moen 1997; Moon 1997). Moreover, as an anthropologist who has conducted fieldwork for several years in Japan’s mountainous interior, I can attest that many rural communities are alive and well, and deserve our continuing attention as interesting, dynamic places. In this chapter, however, I will confine my discussion to the significance of rural Japan as an abiding source not only of natural and human resources, but of symbolic ones as well. Whatever the actual case may be, Japan’s cultural identity is perceived as being heavily rooted in the agrarian traditions of its rural areas. This in itself makes them important.Many theorists have sought to demonstrate how the institutional structures of the past live on in the present (Nakamaki 1992; Nakane 1970; Umesao 1984, 1989). Indeed, Japan’s distinctive historical experience is a major element in nihonjinron assertions. The more compelling issue, however, relates to strategic uses of the past