Image schemata in the brain
Image schemata in the brain
复制标题
大脑中的图像图式
DOI：
10.1515/9783110197532.2.165
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Rohrer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Rohrer
将大脑作为一个有机的生物实体来关注，它随着有机体的生长和发展而增长和发展，这是建立一个关于图像图式如何构建语言的神经可信理论的先决条件。来自认知神经科学的趋同证据已经开始建立意象图式的神经基础，即动态激活模式，这些模式在感觉运动皮质的神经映射中共享。首先，我讨论了许多关于正常受试者的实验研究，再加上最近对患者身体部位语言缺陷的神经学研究，已经开始确定感觉运动皮质对身体动作术语和句子的语义理解至关重要。其次，通过动物神经解剖学研究和人类神经成像研究追踪表象图式的认知和神经发展，回顾了表象图式的神经生物学基础。我认为埃德尔曼的次级神经系统理论是最有可能解释感觉运动皮质的整合区域如何发展感觉运动和图像图式功能的过程。第三，我评估了最近fMRI和ERP实验的证据，这些证据表明，字面和隐喻语言刺激激活了感觉运动皮质区域，这与图像图式假说一致。我的结论是，这些新出现的证据表明，图像图式是如何发挥感觉运动皮质结构、语言表达和隐喻的功能的。
A focus on the brain as an organic biological entity that grows and develops as the organism does is a prerequisite to a neurally-plausible theory of how image schemata structure language. Convergent evidence from the cognitive neurosciences has begun to establish the neural basis of image schemata as dynamic activation patterns that are shared across the neural maps of the sensorimotor cortex. First, I discuss the numerous experimental studies on normal subjects that, coupled with recent neurological studies of body-part language deficits in patients, have begun to establish that the sensorimotor cortices are crucial to the semantic comprehension of bodily action terms and sentences. Second, by tracing the cognitive and neural development of image schemata through both animal neuroanatomical studies and human neuroimaging studies, I review the neurobiologically plausible bases for image schemata. I propose that Edelman’s theory of secondary neural repertoires is the likeliest process to account for how integrative areas of the sensorimotor cortex can develop both sensorimotor and image schematic functions. Third, I assess the evidence from recent fMRI and ERP experiments showing that literal and metaphoric language stimuli activate areas of sensorimotor cortex consonant with the image schemata hypothesis. I conclude that these emerging bodies of evidence show how the image schematic functions of the sensorimotor cortex structure linguistic expression and metaphor.
影响因子：
56.9
作者：
KNUDSEN, EI;BRAINARD, MS
通讯作者：
BRAINARD, MS