Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset

Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/10634266070150010401
复制
发表时间:
2007-03-01
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Croninger, Robert G.
Croninger, Robert G.
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Achilles, Georgianna M.;McLaughlin, Margaret J.;Croninger, Robert G.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

停学和开除被广泛用于排斥在学校表现出问题行为的残疾和非残疾学生,尽管存在有争议的法律的辩论,也有证据表明这些方法与高度生态压力和有问题的发展结果有关。使用选定的参与者数据(N = 1,824)从SEELS研究中,研究作者将多水平预测因子输入逻辑回归分析,以确定与三个高排斥残疾组的学生中较高的排斥可能性(HLE)相关的因素:情绪/行为障碍(M),诊断为注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)的其他健康损害(OHI),学习障碍(LD)。当作者一起检查残疾群体时,与LD学生相比,EBD和ADHD学生更有可能出现HLE。HLE还与非裔美国人种族、年龄较大、男性、社会经济地位低、多次转学、城市学校教育以及父母对学校满意度低有关。然而,当作者单独检查残疾组时,预测特征因残疾类型而显着不同。作者讨论了对学校课程的影响。
Suspension and expulsion are widely used to exclude students with and without disabilities who present problem behaviours in school, despite contentious legal debate and evidence associating these methods with high ecological stress and problematic developmental outcomes. Using selected participant data (N = 1,824) from the SEELS study, the study authors entered multilevel predictors into logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with higher likelihood of exclusion (HLE) among students in three high-exclusion disability groups: emotional/behavioral disorders (M), other health impairment (OHI) with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and learning disability (LD). When the authors examined disability groups together, HLE was more likely among students with EBD and ADHD compared to students with LD. HLE was also associated with African American ethnicity, older age, male gender, low socioeconomic status, multiple school changes, urban schooling, and having parents who expressed low school satisfaction. However, when the authors examined the disability groups individually, predictor profiles varied markedly by disability type. The authors discuss implications for school programs.