Pseudoneglect in sentence bisection: a comparison between Italian and Chinese
Pseudoneglect in sentence bisection: a comparison between Italian and Chinese
复制标题
句子二分中的伪忽略：意大利语和汉语的比较
DOI：
10.1080/20445911.2016.1170689
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Zhang, Yaxu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arduino, Lisa S.;Veronelli, Laura;Zhang, Yaxu
阅读习惯和大脑不对称都可能对平分偏误产生影响。研究表明，与阅读日语或字母文字相比，阅读中文时右半球的活动更多。因此，我们可以预期，与意大利语相比，汉语的句子对分，在右半球的调节下，更强的注意力分配到左侧，会产生更大的向左对分错误。在本研究中，母语为汉语和意大利语的人分别对汉语和意大利语的句子进行了切分，这些句子在语言领域（句法或语义连贯、明确性和沉重性）和语言操纵位置（左、右和缺席）上都有所不同。汉语的句子比意大利语的句子更向左分。语言操作的位置进一步调节了二分偏差，尽管仅适用于汉语。结果表明，在意大利语和汉语中，视觉知觉、语言和注意因素对句子二分的影响方式不同。
ABSTRACT Both reading habits and cerebral asymmetries may play a role on bisection bias. There has been shown to be more recruitment of the right hemisphere in reading Chinese, compared to Japanese or alphabetic scripts. One therefore would expect that for sentence bisection in Chinese compared to Italian, a stronger allocation of attention to the left, mediated by the right hemisphere, would yield larger leftward bisection errors. In this study, native Chinese and Italian speakers bisected Chinese and Italian sentences, respectively, which varied in linguistic domain (syntactic or semantic coherence, definiteness and heaviness) and in the position of the linguistic manipulation (left, right and absent). The sentences were bisected more leftwards for Chinese than for Italian. Bisection deviations were further modulated by the position of the linguistic manipulation, though only for Chinese. We concluded that visuo-perceptual, linguistic and attentional factors influence sentence bisection, in a different way in Italian and Chinese.