Sluggish cognitive tempo and its neurocognitive, social and emotive correlates: a systematic review of the current literature.

Sluggish cognitive tempo and its neurocognitive, social and emotive correlates: a systematic review of the current literature.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/2049-9256-2-5
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Journal of molecular psychiatry
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tucha O
Tucha O
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mueller AK;Tucha L;Koerts J;Groen Y;Lange KW;Tucha O

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

由于在从DSM-III到DSM-IV的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断标准转换过程中,消除了与缓慢认知节奏(SCT)相关的项目,因此对SCT及其相关的认知、情感和社会后果的兴趣正在增加。本综述讨论了SCT在临床和社区ADHD人群中的最新发现。我们将进一步关注SCT在不同ADHD人群中的临床相关性、SCT的遗传背景、SCT与内化和其他行为合并症的关系,以及SCT与社会功能及其治疗效果的关系。以“迟缓的认知节奏”、“认知节奏”、“迟缓的节奏”为关键词,对PsycInfo、SocIndex、Web of Science和PubMed上关于SCT治疗ADHD及其他病理的实证研究进行系统综述。63项研究中有32项符合纳入标准,并在本综述中进行了讨论。从目前的文献来看,SCT是一种心理测量学上有效的构念,在ADHD、对立违抗性障碍(ODD)、内化障碍和神经康复的临床领域具有附加价值。SCT的分类已被证明在研究中远非一致;然而,SCT对个体功能(如学业成就、社会交往)的影响似乎是显著的。SCT已被证明与ADHD共享一些基因,然而,与非共享环境因素的关系最为密切。未来的研究应侧重于确定适当的SCT测量,以促进症状定制治疗,并增加对不同ADHD人群的SCT研究。本文的在线版本(doi:10.1186/2049-9256-2-5)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。
Since the elimination of items associated with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) during the transition from DSM-III to DSM-IV from the diagnostic criteria of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), interest in SCT and its associated cognitive as well as emotional and social consequences is on the increase. The current review discusses recent findings on SCT in clinical as well as community based ADHD populations. The focus is further on clinical correlates of SCT in populations different from ADHD, SCT’s genetic background, SCT’s association with internalizing and other behavioral comorbidities, as well as SCT’s association with social functioning and its treatment efficacy. A systematic review of empirical studies on SCT in ADHD and other pathologies in PsycInfo, SocIndex, Web of Science and PubMed using the key terms “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”, “Cognitive Tempo”, “Sluggish Tempo” was performed. Thirty-two out of 63 studies met inclusion criteria and are discussed in the current review. From the current literature, it can be concluded that SCT is a psychometrically valid construct with additive value in the clinical field of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), internalizing disorders and neuro-rehabilitation. The taxonomy of SCT has been shown to be far from consistent across studies; however, the impact of SCT on individuals’ functioning (e.g., academic achievement, social interactions) seems remarkable. SCT has been shown to share some of the genes with ADHD, however, related most strongly to non-shared environmental factors. Future research should focus on the identification of adequate SCT measurement to promote symptom tailored treatment and increase studies on SCT in populations different from ADHD. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2049-9256-2-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.