Condoms + pleasure = safer sex? A missing addend in the safer sex message.
Condoms + pleasure = safer sex? A missing addend in the safer sex message.
复制标题
安全套快乐=安全性行为？
DOI：
10.1080/09540120500411073
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Glasford,DE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Scott-Sheldon,LAJ;Marsh,KL;Johnson,BT;Glasford,DE
自艾滋病毒出现以来，减少性风险的干预和预防方案宣传了“安全套等于更安全的性行为”的信息，特别注重安全套的预防作用（即预防疾病或怀孕）。然而，尽管这一信息无处不在，研究发现，大多数人没有坚持使用避孕套。使用思想列表技术，我们要求男男性行为者（MSM）和异性恋者列出想到避孕套时立即想到的想法。结果表明，男男性行为者有更多的性/感官协会的安全套比异性恋者，这表明，干预措施强调安全套的性/感官方面可能是一个重要组成部分，以增加安全套的使用男男性行为者，而综合的方法（即信息，整合预防，人际关系，性/感官组件）可能更吸引异性恋者。
Since the emergence of HIV, sexual risk-reduction intervention and prevention programmes have promoted the ‘condoms equal safer sex’ message with a particular focus on the preventative aspects of condoms (i.e. disease or pregnancy prevention). Yet despite the pervasiveness of this message, research has found that most people fail to use condoms consistently. Using the thought-listing technique, we asked men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals to list thoughts that immediately came to mind when thinking about condoms. Results show that MSM have more sexual/sensory associations to condoms than heterosexuals, suggesting that interventions highlighting the sexual/sensory aspects of condoms might be an important component to increase condom use among MSM while a combined approach (i.e. messages that integrate preventative, interpersonal, and sexual/sensory components) might be more appealing to heterosexuals.