When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval.
When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.703
复制
发表时间：
2005-07
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Morey;N. Cowan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Morey;N. Cowan
对工作记忆中语言和视觉材料之间的干扰进行的测试产生了不同的结果。如果存在一个中心形式的存储（例如，注意力的焦点；N. Cowan, 2001），那么应该获得跨域干扰。作者通过视觉阵列比较任务（S. J. Luck & E. K. Vogel, 1997）结合各种语言记忆负荷条件来检验这个问题。如果在维持视觉阵列的过程中存在显性语言负荷的检索，则任务之间会发生干扰。这种影响局限于视觉任务的维持期，而不是发音本身的结果。当同时承受较大的无声语言和视觉负荷时，也会发生干扰。这些结果建议使用中央存储以及特定于代码的被动存储。
Examinations of interference between verbal and visual materials in working memory have produced mixed results. If there is a central form of storage (e.g., the focus of attention; N. Cowan, 2001), then cross-domain interference should be obtained. The authors examined this question with a visual-array comparison task (S. J. Luck & E. K. Vogel, 1997) combined with various verbal memory load conditions. Interference between tasks occurred if there was explicit retrieval of the verbal load during maintenance of a visual array. The effect was localized in the maintenance period of the visual task and was not the result of articulation per se. Interference also occurred when especially large silent verbal and visual loads were held concurrently. These results suggest central storage along with code-specific passive storage.