A Provider’s Right to Choose: A Legal History
A Provider’s Right to Choose: A Legal History
复制标题
提供商的选择权：法律历史
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Ziegler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Ziegler
齐格勒揭示了为什么堕胎提供者权利的争论从美国法律和政治中逐渐消失的失落历史。这一章记录了医生索赔的起起落落，记录了一种专门针对女性的替代方案的发展。齐格勒阐明了这种转变的代价。虽然法院曾经将提供者描绘成权利持有人，但美国的判例越来越多地将他们描绘成需要国家监督的操纵者。为了有效地捍卫堕胎权，合法堕胎的支持者不需要重新启用罗伊案中提出的广受诟病的隐私框架。同样，该运动将不得不重新考虑赋予供应商的宪法重要性。在美国，如果提供者被排除在外，堕胎权就没有什么意义了。
Ziegler unearths the lost history of why arguments for abortion providers’ rights faded from American law and politics. The chapter documents the rise and fall of physicians’ claims, chronicling the development of an alternative focused exclusively on women. Ziegler illuminates the costs of this shift. While the court once portrayed providers as rights-holders, American jurisprudence increasingly presents them as manipulators requiring state supervision. In order to effectively defend abortion rights, supporters of legal abortion need not resurrect the widely maligned privacy frame set forth in Roe. Just the same, the movement will have to reconsider the constitutional importance accorded to providers. In the United States, the abortion right will mean little if providers are left out.