Connecting ecosystem services science and policy in the field
Connecting ecosystem services science and policy in the field
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/fee.2390
复制
发表时间：
2021-08
影响因子：
10.3
通讯作者：
J. Ruhl;J. Salzman;C. Arnold;R. Craig;Keith H. Hirokawa;L. Olander;M. Palmer;T. Ricketts
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Ruhl;J. Salzman;C. Arnold;R. Craig;Keith H. Hirokawa;L. Olander;M. Palmer;T. Ricketts
保护和提供生态系统服务（ES）已被许多国家采纳为高级别政策，但令人惊讶的是，这些广泛政策在该领域的应用很少;例如，在许可证发放或其他离散机构行动中很少考虑ES。这一巨大的实施差距的出现，部分是因为科学驱动一般政策的兴趣在环境服务不同于科学需要的实际应用。更好地了解环境政策工具包可以指导更有效的研究，以支持机构的决策。在这里，我们概述了用于通过“五个P”教授环境政策工具的框架：处方，财产，惩罚，支付和说服。然后，我们讨论了离散ES研究所需的有效实施每个工具。为了支持在该领域更大程度地保护ES，科学家和政策制定者必须清楚地认识到彼此的需求。
Conservation and provision of ecosystem services (ES) have been adopted as high‐level policy in many countries, yet there has been surprisingly little application of these broad policies in the field; for example, ES are rarely considered in permit issuance or other discrete agency actions. This large implementation gap arises in part because the science that drove general policy interest in ES differs from the science needed for practical application. A better understanding of the environmental policy toolkit can guide more effective research to support agency decisions. Here, we outline the framework used to teach environmental policy instruments through the “Five P’s”: prescription, property, penalty, payment, and persuasion. We then discuss the discrete ES research required to effectively implement each tool. To support greater conservation of ES in the field, scientists and policy makers must clearly recognize what each needs from the other.