LCC-based framework for building envelope and structure co-design considering energy efficiency and natural hazard performance
LCC-based framework for building envelope and structure co-design considering energy efficiency and natural hazard performance
复制标题
基于 LCC 的建筑围护结构和结构协同设计框架，考虑能源效率和自然灾害性能
DOI：
10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102061
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
6.4
通讯作者：
Shrestha, Som
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shen, Zhenglai;Zhou, Hongyu;Shrestha, Som
针对建筑结构和围护结构系统，综合考虑能源和自然灾害性能的影响，提出了一种基于全寿命周期成本的建筑结构和围护结构协同设计框架。该方法包括两个阶段的设计和决策过程，旨在为基于地理位置的建筑结构和围护结构联合设计提供量化指导。首先，根据全寿命周期费用选择建筑物的结构形式和围护结构类型。然后，评估各种节能建筑围护结构选项(例如，高性能玻璃和隔热材料)的长期成本效益，以完善围护结构设计。建议的联合设计框架通过三个气候条件和地震活动不同的地点(即洛杉矶、孟菲斯和波士顿)的中型办公楼原型的案例研究进行了演示。研究结果突出了建筑结构(抗震)性能与节能设计方案的成本效益之间的相互作用-例如，对于位于高地震区的建筑，抗震增强设计通过减少地震损失大大缩短了高性能建筑围护结构的投资周期；而对于位于气候寒冷和地震风险较低的地区(如波士顿)的建筑，采用高隔热建筑围护结构的空间框架显示出最低的LCC。
This paper presents a life-cycle cost (LCC) informed co-design framework for building structures and envelope systems, holistically considering the influences of energy and natural hazard performance. The proposed method is consisted of a two-stage design and decision-making process, aiming to provide a quantitative guideline for building's structural and envelope co-design based on the its geographic locations. First, the building's structural configuration and envelope type are selected based on the life cycle cost. Then, the long-term cost effectiveness of various energy-saving building envelope options (e.g., high-performance glazing and insulation) is evaluated to refine the envelope design. The proposed co-design framework was demonstrated through the case study of a medium-size office building archetype in three locations with distinct climate conditions and seismic activities (i.e., Los Angeles, Memphis, and Boston). The results highlighted the interplay between building's structural (seismic) performance and the cost-effectiveness of energy-saving design options – e.g., for buildings located in high-seismic regions, seismic enhancing designs greatly reduce the paybak period of high performance building envelope by reducing the seismic loss; whereas for buildings located in regions with cold climate and low seismic risk such as Boston, spatial frame with high insulation building envelope shows the lowest LCC.
登录
查看更多内容
马尔代夫建筑墙壁选定隔热材料的最佳厚度和气隙的成本效益分析和减排
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Mahlia;A. Iqbal
通讯作者：
A. Iqbal
立面系统中的传热和能源使用：不同外墙类型的比较研究
影响因子：
2
作者：
Ajla Aksamija;T. Peters
通讯作者：
T. Peters
DOI：
10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001079
发表时间：
2017-10-01
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
AlHamaydeh, Mohammad;Aly, Nader;Galal, Khaled
通讯作者：
Galal, Khaled
DOI：
10.1061/40943(250)4
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
Forensic engineering
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Mosqueda;K. Porter;J. O’Connor;P. E. McAnany
通讯作者：
P. E. McAnany
DOI：
10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001286
发表时间：
2017-07-01
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
Noshadravan, Arash;Miller, Travis R.;Gregory, Jeremy G.
通讯作者：
Gregory, Jeremy G.