Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe
Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/13625187.2013.819848
复制
发表时间：
2013-08-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Fiala, Christian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Heino, Anna;Gissler, Mika;Fiala, Christian
在医疗保健中，医生和护士因宗教或道德信仰而拒绝参与为某些病人提供治疗，这就产生了出于良心拒服兵役的问题。最常见的是在人工流产时援引CO。在人工流产法律的欧盟成员国中，有21个国家的法律允许援引《公约》。这同样适用于非欧盟国家挪威和瑞士。在欧盟成员国瑞典、芬兰、保加利亚和捷克共和国，CO是不合法的。冰岛立法也没有规定获得公司地位的权利。欧洲的例子证明，关于《国家法令》不应阻止妇女获得服务的建议在许多情况下是失败的。根据居住地、社会经济地位和收入，《宪法》将妇女置于不平等的地位。CO不应被视为仅与卫生专业人员及其权利有关的问题。CO主要涉及妇女，因为它对她们的生殖健康和权利具有非常真实的后果。欧洲国家应评估管制合作社的法律及其对妇女权利的影响。CO不应被用作限制医疗保健法律的权利的微妙方法。
The issue of conscientious objection (CO) arises in healthcare when doctors and nurses refuse to have any involvement in the provision of treatment of certain patients due to their religious or moral beliefs. Most commonly CO is invoked when it comes to induced abortion. Of the EU member states where induced abortion is legal, invoking CO is granted by law in 21 countries. The same applies to the non-EU countries Norway and Switzerland. CO is not legally granted in the EU member states Sweden, Finland, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. The Icelandic legislation provides no right to CO either. European examples prove that the recommendation that CO should not prevent women from accessing services fails in a number of cases. CO puts women in an unequal position depending on their place of residence, socio-economic status and income. CO should not be presented as a question that relates only to health professionals and their rights. CO mainly concerns women as it has very real consequences for their reproductive health and rights. European countries should assess the laws governing CO and its effects on women's rights. CO should not be used as a subtle method for limiting the legal right to healthcare.