Paying the Price: College Costs, Financial Aid, and the Betrayal of the American Dream by Sara Goldrick-Rab (review)
Paying the Price: College Costs, Financial Aid, and the Betrayal of the American Dream by Sara Goldrick-Rab (review)
复制标题
付出代价：大学费用、经济援助和美国梦的背叛萨拉·戈德里克-拉布（Sara Goldrick-Rab）（评论）
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Abdul Abad
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Abdul Abad
PSE，以及为什么它继续受到传统的权力不对称和学科内的地位等级制度的限制的原因。尽管有这两个非常小的瑕疵，调查跨学科合作：跨学科的理论和实践仍然是一个非常值得一读。这不仅适用于对跨学科研究有特定兴趣的学者，而且适用于对科学技术研究（STS）和PSE当前发展有更广泛兴趣的学者。这本编辑过的书仔细审查了那些理所当然的想法，这些想法是不断呼吁跨学科合作的基础，这些合作正在积极塑造PSE的结构。它在完成这一任务的同时保持了相当的公正，这应该对跨学科的倡导者和怀疑者都有吸引力。虽然编辑和一些作者有时对某些支持跨学科的想法表示怀疑，但讨论从未陷入对跨学科合作的教条式否定。除了这种值得称赞的特点，卷还提供了高度的多样性方面的方法，从文献计量分析，人种学。理论范式也是如此，作者采用的观点从组织理论到更传统的建构主义方法。因此，这本书中可能有一些东西适合在各种传统和学科中工作的学者。最后，整个集合是高度可访问的，写在一个水平，应该很容易消化的早期阶段的研究生。它实现了这一点，而没有混淆手头问题的内在细微差别，因此，可能仍然对该专题的专家感兴趣。这应该使它成为一本受欢迎的书，教师希望向学生介绍与跨学科相关的迷人问题。
PSE, as well as the reasons why it continues to be restrained by traditional power asymmetries and status hierarchies within the disciplines. Despite these two very minor blemishes, Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Theory and Practices Across Disciplines remains a very worthwhile read. This is true not only for scholars with a specific interest in interdisciplinary research, but also, for those with broader interests in science and technology studies (STS) and current developments in PSE. This edited volume scrutinizes takenfor-granted ideas that serve as the foundation for the incessant calls for interdisciplinary collaboration that are actively shaping the structure of PSE. It accomplishes this task while remaining fairly impartial, something that should appeal to both advocates and sceptics of interdisciplinarity. While the editors, as well as some authors, at times express skepticism towards certain pro-interdisciplinarity ideas, the discussion never dovetails into a dogmatic dismissal of interdisciplinary collaboration. Beyond such laudable characteristic, the volume also offers a high degree of diversity with respect to methodology, ranging from bibliometric analysis to ethnography. The same is true with respect to theoretical paradigms, with authors employing perspectives ranging from organizational theories to more traditional constructivist approaches. As such, there is likely something in this book for scholars operating within a variety of traditions and disciplines. Lastly, the entire collection is highly accessible, written at a level that should be easily digested by early stage graduate students. It achieves this without obfuscating the inherent nuance of the issues at hand, and thus, will likely remain of interest to specialists on the topic. This should render it a popular book among instructors wishing to introduce students to the fascinating issues associated with interdisciplinarity.