How can planning for accessibility lead to more integrated transport and land-use strategies? Two examples from the Netherlands
How can planning for accessibility lead to more integrated transport and land-use strategies? Two examples from the Netherlands
复制标题
无障碍规划如何导致更加综合的交通和土地利用战略？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
L. Bertolini
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Straatemeier;L. Bertolini
摘要 在科学界和专业界，人们普遍认识到需要整合交通和土地使用政策，以实现更可持续的城市发展。可达性可以为这种整合提供概念焦点，因为它与交通系统的特征（例如速度和旅行成本）以及土地使用系统（例如密度和功能组合）相关。可访问性的概念在科学文献中是众所周知的。然而，对于如何在实践中改善交通用地规划一体化的理解仍然有限。为了解决理论与实践之间的差距，我们讨论了荷兰的两个案例研究，其中交通和土地使用规划的政策制定者制定并使用可达性指标来生成和选择交通和土地使用干预措施的有效组合。对于每种情况，都讨论了所使用的可达性指标的类型、它们对交通和土地利用系统质量综合评估的贡献方式以及评估产生的不同政策选择。最后，我们反思了这种方法的潜力和局限性，以及在日常规划实践中实施该方法的机会和障碍。
ABSTRACT In both the scientific and professional community, the need to integrate transport and land-use policies in order to achieve more sustainable urban development is widely recognized. Accessibility can provide a conceptual focus for this integration because it relates to both features of the transport system (e.g. speed, and travel costs) as well as the land-use system (e.g. density and functional mix). The concept of accessibility is well known within the scientific literature. The understanding of how it can improve transport land-use planning integration in practice, however, is still limited. In order to address this gap between theory and practice, we discuss two case studies in the Netherlands in which policy-makers from both transport and land-use planning developed and used accessibility indicators to generate and select effective combinations of transport and land-use interventions. For each case, the type of accessibility indicators used and the way they contributed to an integrated assessment of the quality of the transport and land-use system and the different policy options that resulted from the assessment are discussed. Finally, we reflect on the potentials and limits of this approach, and on the opportunities and barriers for its implementation in day to day planning practice.