Which is the Only Game in Town? Minority Rights Issues in Estonia and Slovakia During and After EU Accession
Which is the Only Game in Town? Minority Rights Issues in Estonia and Slovakia During and After EU Accession
复制标题
城里唯一的游戏是什么？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ada
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Timofey Agarin;Ada
后共产主义转型与欧洲一体化进程齐头并进。许多关于加入欧盟的文献关注的是在加入前将一套欧洲规范实施到国内立法中的理性决定。人们经常得出的结论是，一旦获得欧盟成员国身份，各国就会屈服于自己的理性，按照内化的规范行事。文章声称，以往的文献忽略了政策制定者在加入前后的更广泛的框架内运作，即国内对政策制定和执行的主权。追踪爱沙尼亚和斯洛伐克在少数群体权利领域的政策动态，我们表明，欧洲一体化在两个面临沉重条件限制的国家带来了对少数群体问题政策执行的更大国内控制。正如我们观察到的那样，这两个国家在加入欧盟的过程中以及后来加入欧盟的过程中都参考了欧盟的条件，巩固了它们的国家和国家建设政策，以主张国内目标在政策制定和实施中的中心地位。
Abstract Post-communist transition went hand in hand with the European integration process. Much of the literature on EU accession focuses on the rational decision to implement a set of European norms into domestic legislation pre-accession. It is often concluded that once EU membership is achieved, states succumb their rationality and act on the basis of internalised norms. The paper claims that the past literature overlooks the wider framework within which policy-makers operate before and after the accession, namely domestic sovereignty over policy-making and implementation. Tracing the policy dynamics in the area of minority rights in Estonia and Slovakia, we demonstrate that the European integration ushered greater domestic control over policy implementation on minority issues in two states exposed to a heavy dose of conditionality. As we observe, both states have consolidated their state- and nation-building policies referencing EU conditionality in the course of accession and later EU membership to assert centrality of domestic objectives for policy-making and implementation.
是什么限制了欧盟对新入盟国家少数民族权利的影响？
DOI：
10.1177/0888325407311796
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
and Cultures
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rechel B
通讯作者：
Rechel B