Online intercultural exchange: policy, pedagogy, practice

Online intercultural exchange: policy, pedagogy, practice
复制标题

在线跨文化交流:政策、教学法、实践

DOI:
10.1590/s1413-24782018230024
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rod Schaefer
Rod Schaefer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
José Luna;Rod Schaefer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

由Robert O'Dowd和Tim刘易斯编辑的《在线跨文化交流:政策、教育学、实践》一书涉及有关电信的问题,共分五个部分,分为17章。在第一章《在线跨文化交流导论》和本卷中,刘易斯和奥多德开始在回顾了该领域的几项研究的基础上,对远程文化交流进行了概念化。尽管作者的语气确实乐观,但他们负责任地提供了数据,这些数据并没有指向世界各地的机构进入或成功使用在线跨文化交流(OIE)。第二章《在线跨文化交流与外语学习:系统综述》也是由O'Dowd和刘易斯撰写,旨在准确地展示OIE如何为大学教育中的外语学习做出贡献。所需的答案是通过一个描述性的地图,其中包括54篇发表在科学期刊和书籍章节。这些调查探讨了离线学习和反思的重要性,以及在任务方面的发展和反馈。在第三章“国际化和在线跨文化交流的作用”中,Wit介绍了以重新定义国际化概念为标志的部分,例如国内国际化和课程国际化。作者认为,学术国际化的所有研究者和管理者都应该关注:这一过程应该扩展到所有学生。在第四章《欧洲的在线跨文化交流:技术现状和对未来的启示》中,Guth提出了一个问题,即远程教育应该
The book Online Intercultural Exchange: Policy, Pedagogy, Practice, edited by Robert O’Dowd and Tim Lewis, touches upon issues concerning telecollaboration and consists of five parts subdivided in 17 chapters. In the first chapter, Introduction to Online Intercultural Exchange and this Volume, Lewis and O’Dowd begin by conceptualizing telecollaboration, based on a review of several studies derived from research in the area. Although the tone of the authors is veritably optimistic, they responsibly present data that do not point to the entry or to the successful use of Online Intercultural Exchange (OIE) in institutions around the world. The second chapter, Online Intercultural Exchange and Foreign Language Learning: A Systematic Review, also written by O’Dowd and Lewis, aims to punctually show how OIE contributes to the learning of foreign languages in university education. The required answer is achieved by means of a descriptive map that includes 54 articles published in scientific journals and book chapters. These are investigations that explore the importance of off-line study and reflection, as well as of development and feedback when it comes to tasks. In chapter 3, Internationalization and the Role of Online Intercultural Exchange, Wit presents sections marked by the redefinition of internationalization concepts such as internationalization at home and internationalization of the curriculum. What the author contends concerns all researchers and managers of academic internationalization: this process should extend to all students. In chapter 4, Online Intercultural Exchange in Europe: State of the Art and Implications for the Future, Guth calls into question that telecollaboration should