Enduring problems for molecular accounts of operant behavior.
Enduring problems for molecular accounts of operant behavior.
复制标题
操作行为的分子解释的持久问题。
DOI：
10.1037/0097-7403.16.2.213
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Williams,BA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Williams,BA
尽管 CP Shimp 等人倡导的联想学习器 (AL) 理论（参见记录 1990-21730-001）可以模拟人类和非人类在自由操作情况下表现的几个特征，但它未能解释许多理论上最有力的发现。它低估了行为对相对强化率的敏感性，并完全忽略了激励变量的任何作用，例如强化的数量和延迟。目前，它还不够全面，不足以替代 RJ Herrnstein 的匹配理论（参见 PA，第 44 卷：10034；另参见 1961）作为行为的一般解释。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
Although the Associative Learner (AL) theory advocated by CP Shimp et al (see record 1990-21730-001) can simulate several features of human and nonhuman performance in free-operant situations, it fails to account for many of the findings that are theoretically most powerful. It underestimates the sensitivity of behavior to relative reinforcement rate and totally omits any role for incentive variables such as amount and delay of reinforcement. At present, it is not sufficiently comprehensive to serve as an adequate alternative to RJ Herrnstein's (see PA, Vol 44: 10034; see also 1961) matching theory as a general account of behavior.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)