A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.
A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/bimj.201700013
复制
发表时间:
2018-03
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
García-Fiñana M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hughes DM;El Saeiti R;García-Fiñana M
Longitudinal discriminant analysis (LoDA) can be used to classify patients into prognostic groups based on their clinical history, which often involves longitudinal measurements of various clinically relevant markers. Patients' longitudinal data is first modelled using multivariate generalised linear mixed models, allowing markers of different types (e.g. continuous, binary, counts) to be modelled simultaneously. We describe three approaches to calculating a patient's posterior group membership probabilities which have been outlined in previous studies, based on the marginal distribution of the longitudinal markers, conditional distribution and distribution of the random effects. Here we compare the three approaches, first using data from the Mayo Primary Biliary Cirrhosis study and then by way of simulation study to explore in which situations each of the three approaches is expected to give the best prediction. We demonstrate situations in which the marginal or random‐effects approach perform well, but find that the conditional approach offers little extra information to the random‐effects and marginal approaches.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
13.5
作者:
MURTAUGH, PA;DICKSON, ER;GIPS, CH
通讯作者:
GIPS, CH
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Komarek, Arnost;Komarkova, Lenka
通讯作者:
Komarkova, Lenka
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Verbeke, G;Lesaffre, E
通讯作者:
Lesaffre, E
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Kohlmann, Mareike;Held, Leonhard;Grunert, Veit Peter
通讯作者:
Grunert, Veit Peter
影响因子:
2
作者:
Komarek, Arnost;Hansen, Bettina E.;Lesaffre, Emmanuel
通讯作者:
Lesaffre, Emmanuel