Dutch housing policy realigned

Dutch housing policy realigned
复制标题

荷兰住房政策调整

DOI:
10.1007/bf02525012
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
H. Priemus
H. Priemus
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Boelhouwer;H. Priemus

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

自提出“90年代住房:从建房到居住”的备忘录以来,荷兰的住房政策发生了变化。备忘录的意识形态信息很清楚:更多的市场,更少的政府。住房对国家预算的要求必须降低。在这一背景下,完全取消政府资助,社会租赁部门更倾向于目标群体(收入达到标准)。对于租金和补贴政策,新政策意味着削减,逐步减少财产补贴,更加重视个人补贴。在建筑方案中,社会部门的重要性有所降低,特别是针对无补贴住房(免费部门)的建造。此外,当局还欢迎大部分住房为业主自住,以及越来越多地向租户销售出租社会住房供业主自住。然而,这在很大程度上仍然是一个“言语管理”的问题:缺乏大力增加业主自用部门的有力措施。目前,不必担心荷兰社会租赁部门会真实的边缘化。
Since the presentation of the memorandum Housing in the Nineties; from building to living, a change took place in the Dutch housing policy. The ideological message of the memorandum is clear: more market, less government. Housing's call on the national budget must be reduced. Into that context fits the complete abolition of government financing, and the stronger orientation of the social rented sector towards the target group (with incomes up to modal). For rent and subsidy policy the new policy means cuts, a gradual reduction of property subsidies and a greater emphasis on individual subsidies. In the building programme the importance of the social sector is decreased, and the construction of unsubsidized dwellings (free sector) is aimed at in particular. The authorities welcome in addition a large proportion of owner-occupied dwellings, together with an increasing sale of rented social housing to tenants for owner-occupancy. However, this remains largely a question of 'management by speech': vigorous measures for greatly increasing the owner-occupied sector are absent. For the time being there need be no fear of a real marginalization of the social rented sector in The Netherlands.