Measuring the Efficiency of Automated Container Terminals in China and Korea
Measuring the Efficiency of Automated Container Terminals in China and Korea
复制标题
衡量中国和韩国自动化集装箱码头的效率
DOI：
10.11175/eastsats.5.584
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kazuhiko Ishiguro
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yunna Xu;Kazuhiko Ishiguro
本研究以中韩两国的货柜码头为研究对象，以四个自动化货柜码头与二十个传统货柜码头为研究对象，运用资料分析法，对货柜码头的效率进行评估。该研究考虑了以下六个输入变量：水深，码头长度，存储区域，码头起重机数量，龙门起重机数量和码头转运车辆数量。集装箱吞吐量被认为是输出变量。位于华东地区的效率最高的码头是：SYCT（上海），SIPG（上海），SMCT（上海），SSICT（上海）和LNOCT（连云港）。在相对性能方面，位于中国海岸线沿着的其他码头排名居中，韩国码头的效率相对较低。虽然自动化集装箱码头的优势并不像预期的那样明显，但起重机输入变量对效率有明显的贡献，有理由相信时间序列DEA分析会更突出地强调这一特征。
This study evaluates the efficiency of Chinese and South Korean container terminals, including four automated and twenty traditional terminals, using data envelopment analysis. The study considers the following six input variables: water depth, quay length, storage area, number of quay cranes, number of gantry cranes, and number of terminal transfer vehicles. Container throughput is considered as the output variable. The most efficient terminals, located in the East China, are: SYCT (Shanghai), SIPG (Shanghai), SMCT (Shanghai), SSICT (Shanghai), and LNOCT (Lianyungang). In terms of relative performance, other terminals located along the Chinese coastline are ranked in the middle, and the terminals of South Korea perform relatively less efficiently. Although the superiority of automated container terminals is not as distinct as expected, there is a clear efficiency contribution from the crane input variable, and there is reason to believe that a time-series DEA analysis would emphasize this feature more prominently.