The predictive validity of the 10/66 dementia diagnosis in Chennai, India: a 3-year follow-up study of cases identified at baseline.
The predictive validity of the 10/66 dementia diagnosis in Chennai, India: a 3-year follow-up study of cases identified at baseline.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/wad.0b013e3181d5e540
复制
发表时间:
2010-07
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Prince MJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jotheeswaran AT;Williams JD;Prince MJ
Dementia prevalence according to DSM-IV criteria tends to be very low in less developed settings. The 10/66 Dementia Research Group's cross-culturally validated diagnosis returns a considerably higher prevalence. Assessing the predictive validity of the 10/66 dementia diagnosis will assist in establishing the best criterion for estimating the population burden of dementia. In a population-based study in Chennai, India, we aimed to follow up after three years 75 people with 10/66 dementia and 193 with cognitive impairment but no dementia (CIND), reassessing diagnostic status, clinical severity, cognitive function, disability and needs for care. We traced 54 people with dementia of whom 25 (46.3%) had died, double the mortality rate among those with CIND. Twenty-two of the 24 people with 10/66 dementia that were re-examined still met 10/66 dementia criteria. There was clear evidence of clinical progression and increased needs for care. Only one ‘case’ had unambiguously improved. Cognitive function had deteriorated and disability increased to a much greater extent than among those with CIND. The strong predictive validity of the 10/66 dementia diagnosis is consistent with a lack of sensitivity of the DSM-IV criterion to mild to moderate cases, which may underestimate prevalence in less developed regions.