Drawing the Line: Spatial Strategies of Community and Resistance in Post-SB1070 Arizona
Drawing the Line: Spatial Strategies of Community and Resistance in Post-SB1070 Arizona
复制标题
划清界线：SB1070 后亚利桑那州社区和抵抗的空间策略
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Adam O Aguirre
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Boyce;S. Launius;Adam O Aguirre
在北美和全球范围内，移民和移民政策的话题已经成为政治斗争和辩论中最具分裂性的断层线之一。在本文中，我们反映了亚利桑那州的拥抱“Atmentin通过强制执行”（ATE）的学说，作为当代美国反移民政策，针对非公民的社会再生产的典范。反思ATE和反对它的运动，我们认为学术和活动家的方法，将规范部署框架的“公民身份”或要求“无国界”，阐明当代移民斗争的利害关系和组成的不足。借用政治学家乔尔奥尔森和他的“民主摩尼教”的概念，我们认为，而不是从根本上面对和不安的公民和非公民之间的规范性划分，反移民演员和政策将警察的必要性。通过在亚利桑那州图森市的两个案例研究，我们研究的可能性和挑战，通过日常生活中的mandian空间动员这样一个摩尼教框架。最后，我们提出“社区组成”作为一个政治议程和方法论框架，通过它来处理归属和排斥的日常地理，同时面对规范的政治类别，结构的民族国家，并证明其暴力。
In North America, and globally, the topics of immigration and immigration policy have become among the most divisive fault lines of political struggle and debate. In this paper, we reflect upon the State of Arizona’s embrace of the “Attrition Through Enforcement” (ATE) doctrine as exemplary of contemporary U.S. anti-immigrant policies that target the social reproduction of non-citizens. Reflecting on ATE and movements against it, we argue for the inadequacy of scholarly and activist approaches that would normatively deploy frameworks of “citizenship” or demands for “no borders” to articulate the stakes and composition of contemporary immigration struggles. Borrowing from political scientist Joel Olson and his concept of “democratic Manichaeism,” we argue instead the imperative to radically confront and unsettle the normative divisions between citizen and non-citizen that anti-immigrant actors and policies would police. Through two case studies in Tucson, Arizona, we examine the possibilities and challenges related to mobilizing such a Manichaean framework through the quotidian spaces of everyday life. We conclude by proposing “community composition” as both a political agenda and a methodological framework through which to attend to everyday geographies of belonging and exclusion while confronting the normative political categories that structure the nation-state and justify its violence.