Target Suitability and the Crime Drop
Target Suitability and the Crime Drop
复制标题
目标适用性和犯罪率下降
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Clarke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Tilley;G. Farrell;R. Clarke
Felson的日常活动观点的最初焦点是20世纪60年代和70年代的犯罪增加，这在很大程度上是日常生活中无意变化的函数（Cohen & Felson，1979）。犯罪率的上升是技术、交通和家庭生活发展的意外副作用，这些发展受到了广泛的欢迎。例如，更多的钱、更多的消费品、更多的节省劳力的设备、更多的运输和更多的妇女就业机会，都给公民带来了好处，但也创造了更多的犯罪机会，从而使犯罪率持续上升。
The initial focus of Felson’s routine activity perspective was the crime increases of the 1960s and 1970s that were largely a function of inadvertent changes in everyday life (Cohen & Felson, 1979). The rise in crime was an unintended side effect of developments in technology, transportation, and domestic life that were widely welcomed. More money, more consumer goods, more labour-saving devices, more transport, and more employment opportunities for women, for example, all brought benefits to citizens, but they also created more crime opportunities and hence sustained increases in crime.