Reduction in liver transplant wait-listing in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.

Reduction in liver transplant wait-listing in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/hep.28923
复制
发表时间:
2017-03
期刊:
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Terrault NA
Terrault NA
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flemming JA;Kim WR;Brosgart CL;Terrault NA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

最近批准的直接作用的抗病毒(DAA)治疗失代偿性肝硬化(DC)继发于丙型肝炎(HCV)的患者与改善肝功能。我们分析了肝移植(LT)等待名单(WL)的趋势,以探讨有效的药物治疗对WL登记的潜在影响。这是一项使用2003-2015年移植受体科学登记数据库的队列研究。确定了47,591名等待接受LT的成人,包括HCV、B型肝炎(HBV)和非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)。如果WL时终末期肝病(MELD)模型≥ 15或肝细胞癌(HCC),则LT适应症定义为DC。上市时代分为“干扰素”([IFN] 2003-2010)、“蛋白酶抑制剂”([PI] 2011-2013)和“直接作用的抗病毒药”([DAA] 2014-2015)。采用Poisson回归分析WL的年标准化发病率。与干扰素治疗相比,HCV患者中DC的LT WL校正发生率在PI时代下降了5%(P = 0.004),在DAA时代下降了32%(P <0.001)。HBV中DC的列表在PI(-17%,P = 0.002)和DAA时代(-24%,P <.001)也有所下降。相反,NASH中DC的WL在PI时期增加了41%(P <0.001),在DAA时期增加了81%(P <0.001)。在PI和DAA时期,HCV和NASH人群中HCC的WL均增加(所有P <0.001),而HBV人群中HCC的WL保持稳定(所有P > 0.05)。结论:在DAA治疗的时代,HCV合并DC的LT WL率下降了30%以上。随着检测的增加、与护理的联系以及DAA治疗的获得,预计WL将进一步减少。
Recent approval of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) secondary to hepatitis C (HCV) is associated with improved hepatic function. We analyzed trends in liver transplant (LT) wait-listing (WL) to explore potential impact of effective medical therapy on WL registration. This is a cohort study using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from 2003-2015. 47,591 adults wait-listed for LT from HCV, hepatitis B (HBV) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were identified. LT indication was defined as DC if the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at WL was ≥ 15 or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Era of listing was divided into “interferon” ([IFN] 2003-2010), “protease inhibitor” ([PI] 2011-2013), and “direct-acting antiviral” ([DAA] 2014-2015). Annual standardized incidence rates of WL were analyzed using Poisson regression. Adjusted incidences of LT WL for DC in HCV patients decreased by 5% in the PI era (P = 0.004) and 32% in the DAA era (P <.001) compared to the IFN era. Listing for DC in HBV also decreased in the PI (−17%, P = 0.002) and DAA eras (−24%, P <.001). Conversely, WL for DC in NASH increased by 41% in the PI era (P <.001) and 81% in the DAA era (P <.001). WL for HCC in both the HCV and NASH populations increased in both PI and DAA eras (P <.001 for all) while HCC WL in HBV remained stable (P > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: The rate of LT WL for HCV complicated by DC has decreased by over 30% in the era of DAA therapy. Further reductions in WL are anticipated with increased testing, linkage to care, and access to DAA therapy.