Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?
Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011
复制
发表时间：
2015-08-01
影响因子：
6.9
通讯作者：
Fox, Jonathan A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fox, Jonathan A.
社会责任倡议的实际影响的经验证据好坏参半。这项荟萃分析通过一个新的视角重新解释了评估：区分促进公民声音以促进改善公共部门绩效的战术方法和战略方法。实地实验研究基于对信息力量的乐观假设的有限的战术干预，既可以激励集体行动，也可以影响国家。创造有利于集体行动的环境，再加上增强国家回应公民声音的能力，前景会更加光明。三明治策略可以通过国家社会的协同作用，帮助“声音”和“牙齿”相互赋权。 (C) 2015 年，爱思唯尔有限公司出版。
Empirical evidence of tangible impacts of social accountability initiatives is mixed. This meta-analysis reinterprets evaluations through a new lens: the distinction between tactical and strategic approaches to the promotion of citizen voice to contribute to improved public sector performance. Field experiments study bounded, tactical interventions based on optimistic assumptions about the power of information alone, both to motivate collective action and to influence the state. Enabling environments for collective action combined with bolstered state capacity to respond to citizen voice are more promising. Sandwich strategies can help 'voice' and 'teeth' to become mutually empowering, through state society synergy. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.