RPPs: Love ‘Em or Leave ‘Em?
RPPs: Love ‘Em or Leave ‘Em?
复制标题
RPP：爱他们还是离开他们？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Dettori
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bronwyn Bevan;Erin C. Henrick;S. McGee;L. Dettori
在过去的三年里，国家科学基金会的全民CS倡议一直呼吁开展研究-实践伙伴关系(RPP)项目。该计划的目标是在为所有K-12青年创建包容性、响应性的计算机科学/计算思维计划方面促进知识和实践。RPP代表了一种研究方法，从设计上讲，这种方法既更公平，也更道德，因为它利用社区利益相关者的经验和观点来为研究问题、方法和意义的产生提供信息。因此，区域合作伙伴关系有可能成为面向股权的倡议的有力工具，例如全民共享社区。从2016年12月开始，华盛顿大学NSF资助的研究+实践合作实验室已经为CS for All领导了十个RPP开发研讨会，总共为700多名社区成员提供服务。在这些研讨会上，我们收集了关于社区如何从采用RPP方法进行工作中受益的数据。在这篇经验白皮书中，我们描述了我们在采用RPP方法进行工作方面所了解到的领域利益。
For the last three years the CS for All initiative at the National Science Foundation has had a call for research-practice partnership (RPP) projects. The goal of the program is to advance both knowledge and practice in creating inclusive, responsive computer science/computational thinking programs for all K-12 youth. RPPs represent an approach to research that, by design, is both more equitable and more ethical because it leverages community stakeholder experiences and perspectives to inform research questions, methods, and meaning-making. RPPs are thus potentially powerful tools for equity-oriented initiatives such as CS for All. Beginning in December 2016, the Research + Practice Collaboratory, an NSF-funded initiative based at the University of Washington, has led ten RPP development workshops for CS for All, collectively serving over 700 members of the community. At these workshops we have collected data about how the community sees itself benefiting from the adoption of RPP approaches to the work. In this experience paper we describe what we have learned about the field’s interests with respect to adopting RPP approaches to the work.