Voluntarism and Transparent Deliberation
Voluntarism and Transparent Deliberation
复制标题
DOI：
10.4314/sajpem.v25i2.31443
复制
发表时间：
2006-01
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
Asbjørn Steglich‐Petersen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Asbjørn Steglich‐Petersen
人们普遍认为，doxastic审议是透明的事实问题的真理的命题被认为是信仰，这套doxastic审议除了实际审议。这一特点是经常援引反对doxastic martarism的论点。我认为，透明度的事实问题发生在实际审议的方式平行于doxastic审议透明度。我认为，这应该使我们重新考虑呼吁透明度的论点，反对doxastic非理性主义，以及更广泛的问题，区分理论与实践的合理性。
Abstract It is widely assumed that doxastic deliberation is transparent to the factual question of the truth of the proposition being considered for belief, and that this sets doxastic deliberation apart from practical deliberation. This feature is frequently invoked in arguments against doxastic voluntarism. I argue that transparency to factual questions occurs in practical deliberation in ways parallel to transparency in doxastic deliberation. I argue that this should make us reconsider the appeal to transparency in arguments against doxastic voluntarism, and the wider issue of distinguishing theoretical from practical rationality.