What psychologists better know about recovered memories, research, lawsuits, and the pivotal experiment.
What psychologists better know about recovered memories, research, lawsuits, and the pivotal experiment.
复制标题
心理学家对恢复记忆、研究、诉讼和关键实验更了解什么。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2850.1995.tb00046.x
复制
发表时间：
1995
影响因子：
5.8
通讯作者：
K. Pope
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Pope
评论EF洛夫图斯和K. Ketcham（1994），The Myth of Repressed Memory：False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse。该评论的重点是洛夫图斯的错误记忆实验，然后在该领域面临的6个广泛的问题：1）在关于被压抑记忆的辩论中选择立场，2）讲述关于其他治疗师的说明性故事，3）指控的证据，4）辩论中统计数据的使用和意义，5）起诉其他专业人士和结扎科学，（6）关于专家证词的实践和政策问题，以及由此产生的监禁与治疗的判决。波普指出了辩论中出现的非常激烈的情绪，以及这如何影响对关键问题的考虑。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2022阿帕，保留所有权利）
Reviews the book by EF Loftus and K. Ketcham (1994), The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse. The review focuses on Loftus's false-memory experiment and then on 6 broad issues facing the field: 1) choosing sides in the debate on repressed memories, 2) telling illustrative stories about other therapists, 3) proof of allegations, 4) the use and meaning of statistics in the debate, 5) suing other professionals and ligating science, and 6) practice and policy issues concerning expert testimony and resulting sentencing of jail vs treatment. Pope points out the very heightened emotions that come out in the debate and how that influences consideration of the crucial questions.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)