On Freezing Effects
On Freezing Effects
复制标题
关于冻结效应
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ángel J. Gallego
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ángel J. Gallego
本文讨论了Rizzi（2006; 2007）的临界冻结的性质，这是一种机制，它对移动到左边缘位置的XP产生岛屿效应，以满足专用的“标准”。与Rizzi（2006）的特征检查实现相反，据称，冻结，如最初在Chomsky的2000; 2001 Probe-Goal框架中概述的那样，仅限于案例/协议系统的纯粹形式特征，标准格式（例如，[topic]、[focus]、[wh]）对于最小化目的是不相关的。因此，有人认为，最好把临界冻结看作是一个接口约束，排除了XP被分配到同一类型的多个解释，易读性/收敛的原因，最终与充分解释的原则。
This paper discusses the nature of Rizzi’s (2006; 2007) Criterial Freezing, a mechanism yielding island effects on XPs moving into edge positions within the Left Periphery to satisfy dedicated ‚criteria‛. Contrary to Rizzi’s (2006) feature checking implementation, it is claimed that freezing, as originally outlined in Chomsky’s 2000; 2001 Probe-Goal framework, is restricted to purely formal features of the Case/agreement systems, criterial formatives (e.g., [topic], [focus], [wh]) being irrelevant for minimality purposes. Consequently, it is argued that Criterial Freezing is best regarded as an interface constraint precluding XPs from being assigned multiple interpretations of the same type, for legibility/convergence reasons ultimately related to the Principle of Full Interpretation.