Authorship: why not just toss a coin?
Authorship: why not just toss a coin?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008
复制
发表时间：
2008-09-01
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Strange, Kevin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Strange, Kevin
如果你正在读这篇评论，这个标题可能会激怒你的职业情感。这很好。在32年的出版生涯中，我经历过两次作者纠纷。这两个问题都向我表明，对于科学论文的作者身份意味着什么、作者身份所传达的责任以及作者身份是如何确定的，人们普遍缺乏理解，这令人不安。本文的目的是讨论作者的道德和责任，并提高对我们职业健康至关重要的问题的认识。我概述了30多年来科学界一直在进行的关于作者身份的广泛讨论，用个人经历来说明这一讨论的各个方面，并就如何解决和防止作者身份问题提供建议。我希望这篇评论能激起辩论和行动，以帮助最大限度地减少滥用和破坏性的作者行为。
if you are reading this commentary, the title probably irked your professional sensibilities. That's good. During 32 years of publishing, I've experienced two authorship disputes. Both of these problems have demonstrated to me that there is a disturbing and pervasive lack of understanding of what authorship on scientific papers means, of the responsibilities that it conveys, and of how it is determined. The goal of this article is to discuss the ethics and responsibility of authorship and to raise awareness of an issue that is fundamental to the health of our profession. I provide an overview of the extensive discussion of authorship that has been ongoing within the scientific community for over three decades, use personal experiences with authorship disputes to illustrate aspects of this discussion, and provide recommendations on how to resolve and prevent authorship problems. It is my hope that this commentary sparks debate and action that will help to minimize abusive and damaging authorship practices.