On being heard: a case for paying attention to the historical ear.
On being heard: a case for paying attention to the historical ear.
复制标题
关于被倾听:关注历史耳朵的案例。
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Sophia Rosenfeld
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sophia Rosenfeld
WRITING IN 1612, THE English anatomist Helkiah Crooke offered his readers a complex, if unoriginal, account of human hearing as a function of the ear and the brain. Sound, he explained, is produced far from its destination, even when generated by the human voice. Oscillations of the air, resulting from “the percussion of two hard and solide bodyes,” must proceed from their initial source across what are often great distances to the opening of the ear. From there, they travel all the way down through the many parts of the middle and inner ear until they finally hit the auditory nerve, the true organ of hearing. Then there is still one final step. These initial impulses we call sound must be conveyed to the common sense, which acts as “Censor and Judge” because its job is to regulate the raw sensations produced by all the external senses. In the “privy-chamber of the soule,” as Crooke also pegged the space of common sense within the mind, the many bits of sound that greet us as we make our way through life are both coordinated with data acquired by other senses and sorted into particular notions worthy of human attention.1 Over the next hundred or more years, this essentially Aristotelian explanatory model slowly fell out of favor.2 The business of hearing was reconceptualized, and the common sense, as a faculty of perception, eventually disappeared from depictions of the human brain altogether. But before we too hastily cast Crooke and his contemporaries into the historical dustbin, we should consider the long shadow cast