Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation
Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation
复制标题
批判性设计和批判性理论：挑衅性设计的挑战
DOI：
10.1145/2317956.2318001
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
John Antanitis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shaowen Bardzell;Jeffrey Bardzell;J. Forlizzi;J. Zimmerman;John Antanitis
建设性设计研究是一种研究形式，设计活动是一种中心研究活动。一种建设性设计研究是一种关键设计，该设计试图破坏或违反社会和文化规范。批判设计的倡导者已将批判理论作为支持其方法的智力资源。有趣的是，在不断增长的设计研究文献中，关键的设计过程仍然不足。在本文中，我们首先解释了为什么很难将关键设计描述为设计实践或过程。然后，我们描述了我们进行的两个关键设计案例研究以及观察到它们在现场时产生的影响。在分享了我们的细分和突破之后，我们对设计挑衅性，研究人员与研究参与者之间的深层关系的价值以及计划并实现一个流畅和新兴的研究计划的需求进行了思考的思考 - 目标帮助澄清关键设计作为一种方法。
Constructive design research is a form of research where design activity is a central research activity. One type of constructive design research is critical design, which seeks to disrupt or transgress social and cultural norms. Critical design's advocates have turned to critical theory as an intellectual resource to support their approach. Interestingly, critical design processes remain under-articulated in the growing design research literature. In this paper, we first explain why critical design is so hard to describe as a design practice or process. We then describe two critical design case studies we undertook and the effects we observed them having when place in the field. After sharing our breakdowns and breakthroughs along the way, we offer reflections on designing for provocativeness, the value of deep relationships between researchers and research participants, and the need to plan for and go with a fluid and emergent research plan --- with the goal of helping clarify critical design as an approach.