Responsibility, probability, and severity of harm: An experimental investigation of cognitive factors associated with checking-related OCD
Responsibility, probability, and severity of harm: An experimental investigation of cognitive factors associated with checking-related OCD
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.brat.2022.104034
复制
发表时间：
2022-01-12
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Lavoie, Stefanie L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Radomsky, Adam S.;Alcolado, Gillian M.;Lavoie, Stefanie L.
强迫性检查的认知模型（Rachman，2002）提出，责任感，伤害的严重性和伤害的可能性相互作用，以促进检查行为。我们在一个生态有效的实验范式中研究了这些因素。两组参与者（强迫检查的强迫症参与者和本科生对照组）被分配到高或低责任条件下，然后检查代表以下内容的对象：（a）高严重性伤害（炉子燃烧器），（B）低严重性伤害（灯泡），（c）高可能性伤害（功能性燃烧器和灯泡），和（d）低可能性伤害（非功能性燃烧器和灯泡）。一般来说，强迫症的诊断，以及伤害的严重程度/可能性增加的情况，以及在较小程度上，责任增加，导致花费更长的时间进行检查。的认知行为模式和治疗强迫性检查的影响进行了讨论。
The cognitive model of compulsive checking (Rachman, 2002) proposes that perceptions of responsibility, seriousness of harm and probability of harm interact to promote checking behaviour. We examined these factors in an ecologically valid experimental paradigm. Two groups of participants (participants with OCD who compulsively check and undergraduate controls) were assigned to a high or low responsibility condition, and then checked objects representing: (a) high seriousness of harm (stove burners), (b) low seriousness of harm (light bulbs), (c) high probability of harm (functional burners and bulbs), and (d) low probability of harm (non-functional burners and bulbs). In general, a diagnosis of OCD, as well as conditions of increased severity/likelihood of harm, and to a lesser degree, increased responsibility, led to a greater period of time spent checking. Implications for the cognitive-behavioural model of and treatment for compulsive checking are discussed.