T regulatory cells in atopic dermatitis and subversion of their activity by superantigens

T regulatory cells in atopic dermatitis and subversion of their activity by superantigens
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jaci.2004.01.772
复制
发表时间:
2004-04-01
影响因子:
14.2
通讯作者:
Leung, DYM
Leung, DYM
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ou, LS;Goleva, E;Leung, DYM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种由分泌超抗原(SAg)的金黄色葡萄球菌定植的慢性炎症性皮肤病。目的:探讨AD患者外周血中是否存在Treg细胞缺陷。方法:采用免疫磁珠法分离AD患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)中的CD 4(+)CD 25(+)和CD 4(+)CD 25(-)T细胞。将细胞与抗CD 3或SAg、葡萄球菌肠毒素B(SE B)一起培养72小时。通过氚化胸苷掺入法测定增殖。通过流式细胞术评估PBMC上的CD 4、CD 8、CD 25和皮肤淋巴细胞相关抗原表达。从分离的T细胞亚群中提取RNA,并测定FoxP 3 mRNA的实时PCR结果。令人惊讶的是,CD 4(+)CD 25(+)T细胞显著增加,(P <0.01)AD患者(6.68% +/-0.99%,n = 15)与哮喘患者相比(3.42% +/-0.58%,n = 12)或非特应性健康对照受试者(3.34% +/-0.43%,n = 14)。AD患者皮肤归巢的CD 25(+)、CD 4(+)、皮肤淋巴细胞相关抗原阳性T细胞的表达也高于哮喘和非特应性受试者,分别为35.95%、22.44%和23.03%(P <0.006)。只有CD 4(+)CD 25(+)细胞表达FoxP 3,而CD 4(+)CD 25(-)T细胞和CD 4(-)细胞不表达FoxP 3。与Treg细胞的已知特性一致,CD 4(+)CD 25(+)细胞对抗CD 3刺激无反应性。当来自每个研究组的CD 4(+)CD 25(+)细胞与CD 4(+)CD 25(-)细胞混合时,抗CD 3刺激后增殖反应同样受到抑制。相比之下,在SEB刺激后,CD 4(+)CD 25(+)细胞不再无反应性。当CD 4(+)CD 25(+)细胞与CD 4(+)CD 25(-)细胞混合后,用SEB刺激,Treg细胞的抑制功能被逆转。然而,在SAg刺激后,Treg细胞失去其免疫抑制活性。这些数据表明了一种新的机制,SAgs可以增强AD患者的T细胞活化。
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease involving colonization by superantigen (SAg)-secreting Staphylococcus aureus. CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells are thought to play an important role in controlling inflammatory responses.Objective: In this study we examined whether Treg cells might he deficient in patients with AD.Methods: CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells were isolated from PBMCs by using immunomagnetic beads. Cells were cultured with anti-CD3 or SAg, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), for 72 hours. Proliferation was measured by means of tritiated thymidine incorporation. CD4, CD8, CD25, and cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen expression on PBMCs was assessed by means of flow cytometry. RNA was extracted from isolated subsets of T cells, and the results of real-time PCR for FoxP3 mRNA were determined.Results: Surprisingly, CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells were significantly (P < .01) increased in patients with AD (6.68% +/- 0.99%, n = 15) compared with in asthmatic patients (3.42% +/- 0.58%, n = 12) or nonatopic healthy control subjects (3.34% +/- 0.43%, n = 14). Patients with AD also had a higher expression of CD25(+) in skin-homing, CD4(+), cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen-positive T cells than asthmatic and nonatopic subjects, with values of 35.95% versus 22.44% versus 23.03%, respectively (P < .006). Only CD4(+)CD25(+) cells expressed FoxP3, whereas CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells and CD4(-) cells did not. Consistent with known properties of Treg cells, CD4(+)CD25(+) cells were anergic to anti-CD3 stimulation. When CD4(+)CD25(+) cells from each study group were mixed with CD4(+)CD25(-) cells, proliferative responses were equally suppressed after anti-CD3 stimulation. In contrast, after SEB stimulation, CD4(+)CD25(+) cells were no longer anergic. Furthermore, when CD4(+)CD25(+) cells were mixed with CD4(+)CD25(-) cells and stimulated with SEB, the suppressive function of Treg cells was reversed.Conclusion: Patients with AD have significantly increased numbers of peripheral blood Treg cells with normal immunosuppressive activity. However, after SAg stimulation, Treg cells lose their immunosuppressive activity. These data suggest a novel mechanism by which SAgs could augment T-cell activation in patients with AD.