Language evaluation: science of art?
Language evaluation: science of art?
复制标题
语言评价：艺术科学？
DOI：
10.1044/jshd.4601.66
复制
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Timmons,J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allen,DV;Bliss,LS;Timmons,J
本研究旨在确定语言发展标准化测试与临床判断之间的一致性程度。使用了语言听觉理解测试（TALC）、卡罗引出语言量表（CELI）和沟通发展顺序量表（SICD）。日托中心经验丰富的语言病理学家对三岁白人学龄前儿童进行了单独测试。每位检查员还根据测试期间的观察结果对正常或受损的语言行为做出临床判断。结果表明，CELI 最符合检查者的临床判断，其次是 SICD 和 TACL。讨论了这些结果的临床意义。
This study was designed to determine the degree of agreement between standardized tests of language development and clinical judgment. The Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language (TALC), the Carrow Elicited Language Inventory (CELI), and the Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development (SICD) were used. Three-year-old white preschool children were tested individually by experienced speech-language pathologists in day-care centers. Each examiner also made a clinical judgment of normal or impaired language behavior, based on observations during the testing. The results indicated that the CELI agreed the most with the clinical judgment of the examiners, followed by the SICD and TACL. The clinical significance of these results is discussed.