Art History and Images That Are Not Art
Art History and Images That Are Not Art
复制标题
艺术史和非艺术图像
DOI：
10.1080/00043079.1995.10786656
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
J. Elkins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Elkins
许多学科对图像研究表现出了新的兴趣。尽管艺术史拥有最发达的批判性和历史学工具来解释图像，但艺术历史学家并没有冒险走出美术和流行图像的领域。因此，其他学科的图像研究正在独立进行，而不是利用艺术史的批评机器。这篇文章介绍了图像研究，并展示了如何即使是最技术性的插图也可以像美术的中心范例一样具有丰富的图像意义。
A number of disciplines are showing new interest in the study of images. Although art history has the most developed critical and historiographic tools for interpreting images, art historians have not ventured far outside the domains of fine art and popular imagery. As a result, image studies in other disciplines are proceeding independently, without utilizing art history's critical apparatus. This essay introduces image studies and shows how even the most technical illustrations can be just as rich in pictorial meanings as central examples of fine art.