Introduction: Participatory Research and Ethics in Mesoamerican Fieldwork
Introduction: Participatory Research and Ethics in Mesoamerican Fieldwork
复制标题
简介：中美洲实地考察的参与性研究和伦理
DOI：
10.1111/napa.12143
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Rees
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walter E. Little;M. Rees
本导言探讨了参与性研究在中美洲由民族志学家实践的具体方式。它介绍了参与性研究的历史及其与一系列伦理问题的相互联系，这些伦理问题在危地马拉和墨西哥进行研究的人类学家的八篇反思性人种学论文中进行了更深入的探讨。这篇介绍和十篇文章在这个问题上，包括两个评论，提出了几个，有时相互矛盾，讨论进行人种学研究在中美洲的复杂过程，特别是，什么参与性研究意味着在这个语言和文化多样性的世界地区。在这个介绍中，参与式研究的历史的关键方面进行了审查，以及有关的同意和保密性，在特定的领域网站，可能与资金和学术机构的要求冲突的伦理问题。本论文集旨在捕捉中美洲实地的民族志经验的全景，以突出合作，以及在参与性研究中遇到的伦理和务实的困境。(I)即使在现场记录中也不能用名字。我们无法预料我们的陈述会如何进行。(We我们有促进人权的伦理和道德责任。2人们要的是钱，而不是合作。3我们挑起与人民的对话。我们可以吸引其他公众。我们可能是不同群体之间对话的促进者。
This introduction explores particular ways in which participatory research is practiced in Mesoamerica by ethnographers. It provides an introduction to the history of participatory research and its interlinkages to a host of ethical concerns that are explored in greater depth in eight, reflexive ethnographic essays by anthropologists who conduct research in Guatemala and Mexico. This introduction and the ten essays in this issue, including two commentaries, present several, sometimes conflicting, discussions about the complicated processes of conducting ethnographic research in Mesoamerica and, in particular, what participatory research means in this linguistically and culturally diverse region of the world. In this introduction, key aspects of the history of participatory research are reviewed, as well as ethical issues related to consent and confidentiality in specific field sites that may conflict with the requirements of funding and academic institutions. This collection of essays aims to capture a panorama of ethnographic experiences in Mesoamerican field sites to highlight the collaborations, as well as the ethical and pragmatic dilemmas encountered in participatory research.(I) can't use names even in field notes.We can't anticipate how our representation will play out.(We have an) ethical and moral duty to promote human rights.People want money, not collaboration.We provoke dialogues with people. We can engage other publics. We are possible facilitators of dialogue between different groups of people.