Formalization and Collective Appropriation of Space on Forest Frontiers: Comparing Communal and Individual Property Systems in the Peruvian and Ecuadoran Amazon

Formalization and Collective Appropriation of Space on Forest Frontiers: Comparing Communal and Individual Property Systems in the Peruvian and Ecuadoran Amazon
复制标题

森林边界空间的正规化和集体占有:比较秘鲁和厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的公共和个人财产制度

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Larson
A. Larson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Cronkleton;A. Larson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文比较和对比了公共和个人财产,以检查国家努力正式产权和保有权保障之间的关系。本文借鉴了在秘鲁和厄瓜多尔亚马逊,选择代表动态森林边界的四个景观马赛克的研究。虽然Hernando de Soto和其他产权学派的理论家强调私人的个人行为和许多集体社区的土地分配,但本研究也发现了许多个体化社区的集体行为和土地分配。集体和社会关系对这两类财产的重要性在所确定的保有权保障来源中尤为突出。虽然所有权是一个重要的来源,但这是不够的,正规化往往是不持久的。这两个群体一方面也强调社交网络和社区关系,另一方面也展示了使用,这进一步确立了与邻居索赔的合法性。
This article compares and contrasts communal and individual properties to examine the relationship between state efforts to formalize property rights and tenure security. The article draws on a study of four landscape mosaics in the Peruvian and Ecuadoran Amazon, selected to represent dynamic forest frontiers. Though Hernando de Soto and other theorists from the property rights school emphasize private individual behavior and land allocation in many collective communities, this research also found collective behavior and land allocation in many individualized communities. The importance of the collective and social relations for both types of properties was particularly salient in the sources of tenure security identified. Though title was one important source, this was insufficient, and often formalization was found to be impermanent. Both groups also emphasized social networks and community relations, on the one hand, and demonstrated use, which further establishes the legitimacy of claims with neighbors, on the other.