The spatialities of intersectional thinking: fashioning feminist geographic futures
The spatialities of intersectional thinking: fashioning feminist geographic futures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/0966369x.2018.1454404
复制
发表时间：
2018-04
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Mollett;Caroline V. Faria
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Mollett;Caroline V. Faria
摘要在本文中，我们强调了交叉性的内在空间性及其对女性主义地理学思想的重要性。交叉性，在其成立之初，已经是一个深刻的空间理论概念，过程和认识论，特别是当通过仔细和认真的黑人女权主义思想和有色人种激进妇女的著作阅读。我们在这里这样做，重新访问库珀，克伦肖，柯林斯和其他关键学者，以证明种族主义，父权制，异性恋和资本主义的连锁暴力一直构成一个空间形态。从20世纪90年代起，女权主义地理思想的借鉴，我们强调了交叉思维对我们的学科的影响，特别是关于种族，性别和阶级的权力如何在地方和通过空间运作。这些作品启发和推动了我们的工作，我们在这里扩展它们，认识到通过后殖民交叉性扩展和丰富女权主义地理学的新学术。最后，我们认为交叉思维是女性主义地理学不可或缺的。团结一致，跨越和通过差异的审讯，与协议和不和谐的工作，我们鼓励更深入的女权主义地理参与与交叉思想家，为我们的奖学金贡献更多的关键（和充满希望）的未来。
Abstract In this article, we highlight the inherent spatialities of intersectionality and its pivotal importance for feminist geographic thought. Intersectionality was, at its inception, already a deeply spatial theoretical concept, process and epistemology, particularly when read through careful and serious engagement with Black Feminist Thought and the writings of radical women of color. We do so here, revisiting Cooper, Crenshaw, Collins and other key scholars to demonstrate that the interlocking violence of racism, patriarchy, heteronormativity, and capitalism have always constituted a spatial formation. Drawing on feminist geographic thought from the 1990s onwards, we highlight the influence of intersectional thinking on our discipline particularly concerning how racial, gendered and classed power operates in place and through space. These pieces have inspired and driven our work, and we extend them here, recognizing newer scholarship that extends and enriches feminist geography through a postcolonial intersectionality. We close by arguing that intersectional thinking is indispensable to feminist geography. Working in solidarity, across and through the interrogation of difference, with agreement and discord, we encourage a deeper feminist geographic engagement with intersectional thinkers, contributing to more critical (and hopeful) futures for our scholarship.