What makes folk tales unique: content familiarity, causal structure, scripts, or superstructures?
What makes folk tales unique: content familiarity, causal structure, scripts, or superstructures?
复制标题
民间故事的独特之处是什么：内容熟悉度、因果结构、剧本还是上层建筑？
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.169
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Einstein,GO
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McDaniel,MA;Hines,RJ;Waddill,PJ;Einstein,GO
要求读者将随机排列的句子重新排序为连贯的文本，与只读控制条件下的非民间故事文本相比，显著提高了回忆能力，但对于民间故事则不然(Go Einstein等人；见记录1991-06480-001)。实验1-3表明，在非民间故事文本中嵌入民间故事的成分(如因果结构、常规脚本、与背景知识相关的内容)并不会使句子解读对提高回忆效果无效。在Exp 4a-4c中，一个民间故事要么以童话的形式呈现，要么作为报纸文章的一部分。两种呈现形式都没有获得显著的句子解读效果(自由回忆)，这意味着故事上层建筑(故事语法)不会导致句子解读效果的缺失。有人建议，要理解为什么民间故事没有句子解读效果，可能需要考虑叙事在社会文化情境认知中所起的功能作用。(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，版权所有)
Requiring readers to reorder randomly ordered sentences into a coherent text significantly enhances recall relative to that in a read-only control condition for non-folk-tale texts but not for folk tales (GO Einstein et al; see record 1991-06480-001). Exps 1–3 showed that embedding components of folk tales (eg, causal structure, conventional scripts, content related to background knowledge) in non-folk-tale texts did not render sentence unscrambling ineffective for increasing recall. In Exps 4a–4c, a folk tale was presented either as a fairy tale or as part of a newspaper article. Significant sentence unscrambling effects (in free recall) were not obtained in either presentation format, which implies that a story superstructure (a story grammar) does not contribute to the absence of the sentence unscrambling effect. It is suggested that understanding why the sentence unscrambling effect is absent for folk tales may require considering the functional role that narrative plays in socioculturally situated cognition.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)