Bio‐Political Geographies
Bio‐Political Geographies
复制标题
生物政治地理学
DOI：
10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00163.x
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
K. Schlosser
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Schlosser
本文回顾了关于生物政治的争论，以澄清其在地理学中的许多用途和应用。在此过程中，我回顾了福柯、哈特和奈格里以及阿甘本是如何构思生物政治的，以及地理学家是如何使用、补充或不同意他们的见解的。更具体地说，我的结构这篇评论围绕着各种分析师如何理解生物政治权力和“传统”形式的主权权力之间的关系，以及相关的，如何通过地理学家对微观尺度的分析重点可以帮助探索这种关系。
This article reviews the debate on bio-politics in order to clarify its many uses and applications in geography. In doing so, I review how bio-politics is conceived by Foucault, Hardt and Negri, and Agamben, as well as how geographers have employed, added to, or disagreed with their insights. More specifically, I structure this review around how various analysts have understood the relationship between bio-political power and ‘traditional’ forms of sovereign power, and, relatedly, how a focus by geographers on micro-scales of analysis can help explore this relationship.