GRADING OF MUSCLE POWER - COMPARISON OF MRC AND ANALOG SCALES BY PHYSIOTHERAPISTS
GRADING OF MUSCLE POWER - COMPARISON OF MRC AND ANALOG SCALES BY PHYSIOTHERAPISTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00004356-198406000-00005
复制
发表时间：
1984-01-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
JOHN, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
JOHN, J
MRC [医学研究理事会]量表用于将肌肉力量从0级到5级进行分级，并与模拟量表进行了比较，在模拟量表中，力量表示为该肌肉预期最大值的百分比。20名治疗师在一系列对比测试中对许多患者进行了检查。MRC等级对于弱肌肉的这种类型的临床评估更可靠和准确，即MRC量表上的0-3级或模拟量表上的0-62%。模拟量表更可靠，更准确地评估更强壮的肌肉，即MRC量表的4级和5级或模拟量表的62-100%。当测试以正常功率的50%或更多操作的大块肌肉时，可以有效地采用模拟量表。
The MRC [Medical Research Council] scale for grading muscle power in stages from 0 to 5 has been compared with an analog scale in which power is expressed as a percentage of the maximum expected for that muscle. Twenty therapists examined many patients in a series of comparative tests. The MRC grade is more reliable and accurate for this type of clinical assessment in weak muscles, that is grades 0-3 on the MRC scale or 0-62% on the analog scale. The analog scale is more reliable an accurate for the assessment of stronger muscles, that is grades 4 and 5 of the MRC scale or 62-100% on the analog scale. Analog scales could be usefully adopted when testing bulky muscles operating at 50% or more of their normal power.