Licensed Segments and Safe Paths
Licensed Segments and Safe Paths
复制标题
许可部分和安全路径
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
R. Mester
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Junko Ito;R. Mester
以下几页概述了一套限制制度，旨在加强和组织围绕“韵律许可”概念的一些当前假设，这些假设在1988年提出，并在后来的工作中得到进一步发展(Bagformhl 1991；Charette 1990；Goldsmith 1990；Inkelas 1991；Itôand Mester 1991；Kaye 1990；Lombardi 1991；Piggot 1991；Zec 1988等)。下文将提出的建议借鉴了最优化理论(普林斯和斯摩棱斯基，1993年)；目标之一是阐明尾部是“二级许可人”的概念(Goldsmith，1990年)，并澄清双列和部分双列(普林斯，1984年)在音节划分方面的特权地位。在阐述了一些背景假设之后(第1节)，我们介绍了构成我们的许可理论的核心的定义和约束(第2节)。我们通过对日语音节结构的分析(第三节)来说明这一方法，并在文章结束时讨论了剩余的问题和与音节系统的一般类型学有关的问题(第四节)。
The following pages sketch a system of constraints intended to sharpen and organize a number of current assumptions surrounding the concept of “prosodic licensing”, as proposed in Itô (1988) and further developed in later work (Bagemihl 1991; Charette 1990; Goldsmith 1990; Inkelas 1991; Itô and Mester 1991; Kaye 1990; Lombardi 1991; Piggott 1991; Zec 1988; and others). The proposal to be developed below draws on Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993); one of the goals is to explicate the notion of the coda as a “secondary licenser” (Goldsmith 1990) and to clarify the privileged status of geminate and partial geminate clusters (Prince 1984) with respect to syllabification. After laying out some background assumptions (Section 1), we present the definitions and constraints that form the core of our theory of licensing (Section 2). We illustrate the approach with an analysis of the syllable structure of Japanese (Section 3) and conclude the paper with a discussion of remaining issues and problems relating to the general typology of syllabification systems (Section 4).