Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number
Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number
复制标题
多重同意clitics：人的互补性与杂食性的数字
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Nevins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Nevins
本文利用人称互补（如PCC效应）和杂食数（如一个复数标记可用于交叉指代多个复数论元）之间的差异，提出多重同意的句法机制对两者都有影响。表面上的差异很大，这是因为人的特征是完全二进制的，而数字特征在句法上是否定的。此外，从各种动词的相互参照词素暗示phi-interactions之间的主题和对象支持的主张，这些元素是clitics，需要一个原则性的形态句法差异clitics和其他DP经历对象的转移，并revisitation的clitic-affix的区别。
This paper capitalizes on the difference between person complementarity (e.g. PCC effects) and omnivorous number (e.g. the fact that a single plural marker can be used to cross-reference more than one plural argument) by proposing that the same syntactic mechanism of Multiple Agree is responsible for both. The widely divergent surface difference results from the fact that person features are fully binary, whereas number features are syntactically privative. Additionally, arguments drawn from a variety of verbal cross-referencing morphemes implicating phi-interactions between subject and object support the claim that these elements are clitics, necessitating a principled morphosyntactic difference between clitics and other DPs undergoing object shift, and revisitation of the clitic-affix distinction.