Association of Multidimensional Schizotypy With Psychotic-Like Experiences, Affect, and Social Functioning in Daily Life: Comparable Findings Across Samples and Schizotypy Measures
Association of Multidimensional Schizotypy With Psychotic-Like Experiences, Affect, and Social Functioning in Daily Life: Comparable Findings Across Samples and Schizotypy Measures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/abn0000522
复制
发表时间：
2020-07-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kwapil, Thomas R.;Kemp, Kathryn C.;Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
本研究采用经验抽样方法（ESM），在2个样本（NS = 165和203），采用不同的措施，精神病样的经验，影响和社会功能，在日常生活中的积极，消极和混乱的精神分裂症的协会。分裂型是理解精神分裂症谱系精神病理学的有用框架，ESM为评估现实世界中的分裂型提供了一种强有力的方法。参与者每天被告知8次，持续7天，以完成ESM问卷。就像假设的那样。在这两个样本中，阳性的精神病样型与日常生活中的精神病样经历密切相关，而阴性的精神病样型与负面经历、积极情感减少和社会冷漠有关。正如预期的那样，无组织的神经型与日常生活中的无组织性有关。此外，它还与消极情绪增加和积极情绪减少有关。因此，积极的，消极的，和混乱的行为类型与独特的，假设的模式的经验，在日常生活中，和两个样本和两个行为类型的测量结果是惊人的一致。请注意，当在2个样本中没有将混乱型人格作为预测因素时，日常生活中的混乱经历和负面影响与阳性的混乱型人格相关。然而，当混乱型人格被作为预测因素时，这些日常生活经历与混乱型人格相关，而不是积极的。这与同时评估积极、消极和无组织的行为类型的访谈和问卷调查的结果相似。研究结果支持的结构效度的多维度模型，包括解体的概念化和评估的非结构化的重要性。
The present study examined the associations of positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy with psychotic-like experiences, affect, and social functioning in daily life using experience sampling methodology (ESM) in 2 samples (ns = 165 and 203) that employed different measures of schizotypy. Schizotypy is a useful framework for understanding schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology, and ESM offers a powerful approach for assessing schizotypy in real-world settings. Participants were signaled 8 times daily for 7 days to complete ESM questionnaires. As hypothesized. positive schizotypy was robustly associated with psychotic-like experiences in daily life, whereas negative schizotypy was associated with negative experiences, diminished positive affect, and social disinterest in both samples. As expected, disorganized schizotypy was associated with disorganization in daily life. Furthermore, it was associated with increased negative affect and diminished positive affect. Thus, positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy were associated with unique, hypothesized patterns of experiences in daily life, and the findings across the two samples and two schizotypy measures were strikingly consistent. Note that when disorganized schizotypy was not entered as a predictor in the 2 samples, disorganized experiences and negative affect in daily life were associated with positive schizotypy. However, when disorganized schizotypy was included as a predictor, these daily life experiences were associated with disorganized, not positive, schizotypy. This is similar to findings from interview and questionnaire studies that have simultaneously assessed positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy. The findings support the construct validity of the multidimensional model of schizotypy and the importance of including disorganization in the conceptualization and assessment of schizotypy.