Hierarchies in World Politics
Hierarchies in World Politics
复制标题
世界政治的等级制度
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
7.8
通讯作者：
Ayşe Zarakol
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Janice Bially Mattern;Ayşe Zarakol
以等级为中心的方法，以IR承诺提供什么无政府主义为中心的方法没有：一个框架，理论和实证分析世界政治作为一个全球体系，而不仅仅是一个国际。在这个命题的核心是层次系统的三个特征，因为它们是在不断增长的IR文献的主题。首先，作为等级制度核心的分化结构与权力有着深刻的联系。因此，等级制度本质上是政治性的。第二，在世界政治中，等级制度不仅对国家之间的关系进行分层、排列和组织，而且对其他类型的行为者也进行分层、排列和组织，甚至常常是在一个单一的分化结构中混合不同的行为者。第三，世界政治中有许多不同类型的等级关系，每一种等级关系都会产生不同的“逻辑”，影响社会、道德和行为结果。等级制度在国际关系文献中被理解为两种方式：狭义上，作为合法权威的关系;广义上，作为有组织的不平等的主体间表现。层次结构以各种不同的方式运行，从排序解决方案到深层结构。我们确定了三个这样的“逻辑”，已卓有成效地探索IR奖学金，并可以形成未来的研究议程的基础：层次作为一个制度化的功能交易之间的演员（权衡的逻辑）;层次作为不同的社会和政治角色塑造的行为（定位的逻辑）;和层次作为一个生产性的政治空间或结构（生产力的逻辑）。
Abstract Hierarchy-centered approaches to IR promise to deliver what anarchy-centered approaches have not: a framework for theorizing and empirically analyzing world politics as a global system rather than just an international one. At the core of this proposition are three features of hierarchical systems as they are represented across the growing IR literature on the topic. First, the structures of differentiation at the core of hierarchical systems are deeply implicated with power. Hierarchical systems are thus intrinsically political. Second, in world politics, hierarchies stratify, rank, and organize the relations not only among states but also other kinds of actors as well, and often even a mix of different actors within a single structure of differentiation. Third, there are many different kinds of hierarchical relations in world politics, each of which generate different “logics” influencing social, moral, and behavioral outcomes. Hierarchy has been understood in the IR literature in two ways: narrowly, as a relationship of legitimate authority; and broadly, as intersubjective manifestations of organized inequality. Hierarchy operates in a variety of different ways that range from ordering solutions to deep structures. We identify three such “logics” that have been fruitfully explored in IR scholarship and that can form the basis of a future research agenda: hierarchy as an institutionalized functional bargain between actors (a logic of trade-offs); hierarchy as differentiated social and political roles shaping behavior (a logic of positionality); and hierarchy as a productive political space or structure (a logic of productivity).
特殊责任：全球问题和美国实力
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bukovansky
通讯作者：
Bukovansky